"Mario Weilguni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> IMO this should do:
> Alter sequence foo_bar_seq rename to foo_baf_seq;
> Alter table foo alter baf set default nextval('foo_baf_seq')
No, it should not, because that risks breaking other references to the
sequence (eg, in user-written functions). If the user is feeling that
he wants consistency, he can rename the sequence himself and take
responsibility for any side-effects on his code.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
