"Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Sure, but it might be getting delivered to, say, your "sleep" command. You >> haven't checked the return value of sleep to handle any errors that may >> occur. >> As it stands you have to check for errors from every single command executed >> by your script. > > The expectation is that something like SIGINT or SIGQUIT would be > delivered to both the sleep command and the shell process running the > script. So the shell should fail anyway. (Of course, a nontrivial > archive or recovery script had better be checking for failures at each > step, but this is not very relevant to the immediate problem.)
Hm, I tried to test that before I sent that. But I guess my test was faulty since I was really testing what process the terminal handling delivered the signal to: $ cat /tmp/test.sh #!/bin/sh echo before sleep 5 || echo sleep failed echo after $ sh /tmp/test.sh ; echo $? before ^\ /tmp/test.sh: line 4: 23407 Quit sleep 5 sleep failed after 0 -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
