Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah ... a protocol change is *painful*, especially if you really want
clients to behave in a significantly new way.

A backward-incompatible protocol change is painful, sure, but ISTM we could implement what Greg describes as a straightforward extension to the V3 protocol. Then the backend could just avoid sending the query progress information to < V4 protocol clients.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to