Tom Lane wrote:
Yeah ... a protocol change is *painful*, especially if you really want
clients to behave in a significantly new way.
A backward-incompatible protocol change is painful, sure, but ISTM we
could implement what Greg describes as a straightforward extension to
the V3 protocol. Then the backend could just avoid sending the query
progress information to < V4 protocol clients.
-Neil
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
