Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Actually, the more I think about it the more I think that 3 numbers
>> might be the answer.  99% of the code would use only the permanent ID.

> Don't we already have such a permanent number -- just one we don't use
> anywhere in the data model? Namely the oid of the pg_attribute entry.

Nope, because pg_attribute hasn't got OIDs.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to