"Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, Tom Lane does not like how invasive the patch is.

If GNUTLS really wants to take market share from OpenSSL, why don't they
provide a more nearly compatible API?  I don't see why we should have
to jump through so many hoops in order to satify someone else's license
fetish.  (And it is a fetish, because only a compulsively narrow-minded
reading of the licenses yields the conclusion that there's a problem.)

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to