* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > 4) GNUTLS development seems more active? OpenSSL has been in a frozen/mature
> >    state for a while. I don't understand why OpenSSL is still labelled as
> >    0.9.x, which might indicate alpha quality, under heavy development.
> > 
> > I don't find the reasons too compelling - but they are points to
> > consider.
> 5) GNUTLS does not run well under all of our supported platforms.

While I don't disagree about that, I would like to reiterate that I
wouldn't advocate or even suggest dropping OpenSSL support or removing
OpenSSL as the default.



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to