* Joshua D. Drake ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > 4) GNUTLS development seems more active? OpenSSL has been in a frozen/mature > > state for a while. I don't understand why OpenSSL is still labelled as > > 0.9.x, which might indicate alpha quality, under heavy development. > > > > I don't find the reasons too compelling - but they are points to > > consider. > > 5) GNUTLS does not run well under all of our supported platforms.
While I don't disagree about that, I would like to reiterate that I wouldn't advocate or even suggest dropping OpenSSL support or removing OpenSSL as the default. Thanks, Stephen
Description: Digital signature