Ron Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> What value is allowing multiple queies via PQexec()
>>
>> The only argument I can think of is that it allows applications to be
>> sloppy about parsing a SQL script into individual commands before they
>> send it. (I think initdb may be guilty of exactly that BTW...) At the
>> same time you could argue that such sloppiness is inherently a Bad Idea.
> Doesn't it also avoid some network(?) overhead when you have
> a large number of small inserts or updates?
> I seem to recall a previous company where we had a major performance
> by concatenating a bunch of updates with ";"s in between and sending
> them to postgresql as a single command.
These days you'd probably be better off using a multi-row VALUES() list
if relevant. Also, if you really want to send multiple statements like
that, there's a cleaner way to do it: use the extended query protocol
and don't Sync or wait for a reply until you've sent them all.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
