Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > The latter does not exist, AFAIK. Before feature freeze for cycle X, we
> > don't usually hold patches for release X+1, as I understand it.
> > 
> > In general, we should try to hold patches as little amount of time as
> > possible. That way they don't go stale as easily.
> I did not follow this thread closely, but it would be nice if someone 
> could compile all of these defacto standards into a wiki page.

The developer's FAQ has that information:

    <P>A web site is maintained for patches awaiting review,
    <a href="";></a>, and
    those that are being kept for the next release,
    <a href="";></a>.</P>

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to