Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
> Hey, is there any good reason why FSM is sized by a static GUC variable?   
> Why couldn't we just automatically have the system use as much memory as 
> it needs for FSM, provided that it's not more than some reasonable limit, 
> like 15% of shared memory?
> Seems like that would eliminate one area of user confusion, as well as 
> over-allocation.

I don't think any of our shared memory segments auto-size.  What would
you take memory from to increase FSM?

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to