On Wed, 3 Jan 2007 10:16:41 -0500
Jim Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Given that the TODO list is the official compilation of things that  
> need to get done, ISTM that anything warranting a TODO or XXX in the  
> code should probably be on the TODO list.

There are a wide class of possible improvements / fixes that are too small to 
bother adding to the TODO list, but should still be recorded somewhere. 
Recording those improvements in the source code seems better than not recording 
them at all.

Also, minor improvements to some part of the implementation are typically 
dependent on their context in the source code. Since TODO entries are often 
lacking in context as it is, I don't think trying to move everything to the 
TODO list would be wise.


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to