On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:15:50PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote: > On Wed, 2007-01-10 at 16:00 -0500, Steven Flatt wrote: > > On 1/9/07, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you are doing date range partitioning it should be fairly > > simple to > > load data into the latest table directly. That was the way I > > originally > > intended for it to be used. The rules approach isn't something > > I'd > > recommend as a bulk loading option and its a lot more complex > > anyway. > > The problem we have with blindly loading all data into the latest > > table is that some data (< 5%, possibly even much less) is actually > > delivered "late" and belongs in earlier partitions. So we still > > needed the ability to send data to an arbitrary partition. > > Yes, understand the problem. > > COPY is always going to be faster than INSERTs anyhow and COPY doesn't > allow views, nor utilise rules. You can set up a client-side program to > pre-qualify the data and feed it to multiple simultaneous COPY commands, > as the best current way to handle this. > > -- > Next section aimed at pgsql-hackers, relates directly to above:
I'm wondering if you see any issues with COPYing into a partitioned table that's using triggers instead of rules to direct data to the appropriate tables? BTW, I think improved copy error handling would be great, and might perform better than triggers, once we have it... -- Jim Nasby [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com 512.569.9461 (cell) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
