Simon Riggs wrote: > On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 12:37 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > The trace probe was incorrect > > Yes, incomplete, no doubt. On that point you were 100% right to reject. > > > and kind of at an odd place. I don't > > think we want to go down the road of throwing trace in everwhere, do we? > > I would like to see a more systematic approach to it. > > I guess my systematic approach was to add PG_TRACE to all new log points > from now on, so we have a choice of which trace/log mechanism to use.
I think the right approach is to look at our existing code and come up with places we want them, and add them in one shot. Doing thing in small parts doesn't work too well with a project this size. -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
