Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Ok, it does what it's intended to do. But in testing it I also
>>> confirmed that a database-wide vacuum creates a pgstat entry for it and
>>> for all tables in it. Is this something we want to prevent?
>>
>> That's odd, because I didn't see any such thing when I tested in CVS tip
>> the other day. Or did you have stats_block_level turned on?
> Yes, I turned it on for this test.
Well, the vacuums certainly accounted for I/O, so I suppose this is
reasonable behavior.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
