Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But yeah, that's probably a good idea. A quick look at the code says we
> should at least ask people who have this problem to give it a run with
> logging at DEBUG5 which should then log exactly what the errorcode was.
> Or are you seeing more places that need such logging first?
DEBUG5 is going to be a bit voluminous, but let's try that if we can.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
