FYI, Neil has corrected this in CVS HEAD. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 15:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > >> AFAICT it's just junk. It happens to be the input times > >> MAX_RANDOM_VALUE, but what use is that? I wonder if we shouldn't > >> change the function to return VOID > > > I agree. Given how soon we want to get an 8.2 beta out the door, perhaps > > this change would be best postponed to 8.3 (unless there's another > > outstanding 8.2 patch that requires initdb?). > > Nothing outstanding at the moment. > > Although this is surely a small change, it's also pretty low-priority, > so I'd counsel leaving it for 8.3 rather than trying to cram it in now. > We have more important things to be worrying about ... > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org -- Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
