On Thu, 2007-01-25 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > ISTM that we would get the effect your looking for by just moving the 
> > xl_tot_len field to the end, and only storing it for records with backup 
> > blocks:
> I like that formulation better --- seems like less
> change-for-the-sake-of-change.

Will do.

  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

Reply via email to