Tom Lane wrote:
> Heikki Linnakangas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'd like to see still more evidence that it's a problem before we start 
> > changing that piece of code. It has served us well for years.
> What I see here is mostly evidence suggesting that we should consider
> raising NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS, rather than anything more invasive.

Added to TODO:

        * Consider increasing NUM_CLOG_BUFFERS

  Bruce Momjian   [EMAIL PROTECTED]

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to