Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So I still tthink it's a good idea. Even though it doesn't solve every
> case, it solves a lot of them I think. And more importantly on that, I
> don't see how it would *break* anything (given that it still fires only
> when running as a service, when everything on stderr is just thrown away
> anyway). Do you see suhc a failure case?

The case I'm worried about is subprocess startup, where we haven't yet
been able to re-set any of these variables correctly.  And yes, I think
it's an issue: if a DBA is expecting to find PG error messages in the
syslogger files, he's unlikely to go look in the eventlog.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to