"Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> "Bruce Momjian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> OK, please propose some wording so at least we can get agreement on
>> that.
> How about something open-ended like "arrange for updates that do not update
> columns referenced by foreign keys from other tables to avoid being blocked by
> locks from concurrent RI checks"

Hum. Reading back in the thread it seems what I wrote is basically equivalent
to the wording Simon originally proposed.

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to