Tom Lane wrote: > [ time to move this thread to -hackers ] > > Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Alvaro Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >>>> Tom Lane wrote: > >>>>> BTW, I don't care much for the terminology "phantom cid" ... there's > >>>>> nothing particularly "phantom" about them, seeing they get onto disk. > >>>>> Can anyone think of a better name? The best I can do offhand is > >>>>> "merged cid" or "cid pair", which aren't inspiring. > > >>>> MultiCid, like the MultiXacts? Maybe not, they're quite different > >>>> beasts... > > >>> Dual cid? Double cid? > > >> "Double cid" doesn't sound too bad. Another thought that just came to > >> mind is "cid interval" or some variant of that. > > > I don't like "double ctid" because it is really just one ctid, but > > represents two. I am thinking "packed ctid" is the right wording. It > > doesn't have the same impact as "phantom", but it is probably better. > > Packed doesn't seem to have quite the right connotation either --- it > sounds like it means there are two separable fields in the CID value. > > Maybe "composite cid"?
At one point I was thinking "combo". but "composite" sounds good. > Another issue that we need to think about before we go too far with this > is the problem that we punted on before 8.2 release: how to deal with > rolling back an upgrade of a row-level lock from shared to exclusive > within a subtransaction. I'm a bit nervous about committing to merging > cmin and cmax before we have an idea how we're going to solve that --- > it might foreclose a solution. Or maybe we could piggyback on phantom/ > composite/whatever CIDs to solve it, which would be great, but let's > try to sketch out a solution now. Good point. Right now we put our new cid on top of the old lock cid, making rollback impossible to the old lock. What if instead of overwriting our old cid with a new one, we create a composite cid, and if we roll back, we look up the composite pair and put the old cid back. It would only work with two cids, but that seems sufficient. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
