Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Woh.  Peter, you realize one of the reasons we use StrNCpy as a macro is
> for performance.  I don't see strlcpy as a macro.

Huh?  StrNCpy is a wrapper around strncpy().  Do you have reason to
think that strncpy() is especially tightly implemented on most

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to