On Sunday 11 February 2007 05:59, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:20:35PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > I do > > agree with adding a test when you think it is likely to be able to catch > > a whole class of errors, or even a specific error if it seems especially > > likely to recur, but right now I'm not seeing how we do that here. > > Well, currently the regression tests only make a handful of functional > indexes, and never insert any data into any of them. So arguably > there's a benefit to just adding a handful of inserts and updates > somewhere to test these. That a whole area of code not currently > tested. > > In my memory I remember a site that displayed the code coverage of the > regression tests, but I can't find it now. Does anybody know? >
Are you thinking of spikesource? According to thier numbers, we currently cover about 40% of the code base. http://developer.spikesource.com/info/search.php?c=POSTGRESQL&view=details -- Robert Treat Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
