"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As far as I understood the proposal, tgargs wouldn't go away, it would > just not be populated for RI triggers.
Yes, of course. I wasn't suggesting that we take away the ability to pass arguments to triggers in general. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org