"Florian G. Pflug" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As far as I understood the proposal, tgargs wouldn't go away, it would
> just not be populated for RI triggers.

Yes, of course.  I wasn't suggesting that we take away the ability to
pass arguments to triggers in general.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to