Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> delay.  I just stuck a fixed 100msec delay into the accept-failed code
>>> path.
>> Seems worth mentioning that bgwriter sleeps 1 sec in case of failure.
>> (And so does the autovac code I'm currently looking at).

> There is probably a good case for a shorter delay in postmaster, though.

Yeah, that's what I thought.  We don't really care if either bgwriter or
autovac goes AWOL for a little while, but if the postmaster's asleep
then nobody can connect.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
       subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
       message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

Reply via email to