Hi,

From: Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pg_restore fails with a custom backup file
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:38:59 +0100

> On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 05:30:48PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 19, 2006 at 04:58:22PM +0100, Zeugswetter Andreas ADI SD wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > > > MinGW has fseeko64 and ftello64 with off64_t.
> > > > > > >   
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Maybe we need separate macros for MSVC and MinGW. Given the other 
> > > > > 
> > > > > You mean something quick and dirty like this ? That would work.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, except does that actually work? If so you found the place in the
> > > > headers to stick it without breaking things that I couldn't find ;-)
> > > 
> > > Compiles clean without warnings on MinGW, but not tested, sorry also no
> > > time.
> > 
> > Does not compile on my MinGW - errors in the system headers (unistd.h,
> > io.h) due to changing the argument format for chsize(). The change of
> > off_t propagated into parts of the system headers, thus chaos was
> > ensured.
> > 
> > I still think we need to use a pgoff_t. Will look at combining these two
> > approaches.
> 
> Here's a patch that tries this.
> *needs more testing*. But built with this patch, I can dump and
> restore a table at the end of a 10gb database without errors.

I tried the attached patch. But I got the following error.

pg_backup_archiver.o(.text+0x1fa4): In function `allocAH':
C:/msys/1.0/home/y-asaba/postgresql-8.2.3-patch/src/bin/pg_dump/pg_backup_archiver.c:1580:
 undefined reference to `fseeko64'
...
make[3]: *** [pg_dump] Error 1

  $ uname -sr
  MINGW32_NT-5.1 1.0.10(0.46/3/2)

Is MINGW version too old?
--
Yoshiyuki Asaba
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

Reply via email to