On 2/19/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 13:12 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
>> I don't understand -- what problem you got with "NO OPERATION"?  It
>> seemed a sound idea to me.

> It seems nonorthogonal.  What if only some of the tables you mentioned
did not
> exist?  Do you get "SOME OPERATION"?

I'd say you get DROP TABLE as long as at least one table was dropped.


How about DROP TABLE <cnt> where 'cnt' is the number of tables dropped ?

Thanks,
Pavan

--

EnterpriseDB     http://www.enterprisedb.com

Reply via email to