On 2/19/07, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Am Montag, 19. Februar 2007 13:12 schrieb Alvaro Herrera:
>> I don't understand -- what problem you got with "NO OPERATION"? It
>> seemed a sound idea to me.
> It seems nonorthogonal. What if only some of the tables you mentioned
> exist? Do you get "SOME OPERATION"?
I'd say you get DROP TABLE as long as at least one table was dropped.
How about DROP TABLE <cnt> where 'cnt' is the number of tables dropped ?