"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> After looking over the code it seems that the executor needs a limited
>> subset of the Query fields, namely
>> ...
>> which I think we should put into a new TopPlan node type.

> All else sounds good, but why would we be caching a plan that used these
> fields?

Um, what's your point?  I certainly have no desire to support two
different Executor APIs depending on whether we think the command might
be worth cacheing or not.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to