Florian G. Pflug wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > >Florian G. Pflug wrote: > >>Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > >>>No you're right, it's related to the WAL undo stuff that was never > >>>actually implemented. It's dead code. > >>> > >>>Teodor Sigaev wrote: > >>>>Opps, sorry, I missed checkpoint keyword > >>>> > >>>>Teodor Sigaev wrote: > >>>>>>What am I missing? > >>>>>Seems, it's about that > >>>>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-06/msg00085.php > >>Thanks - everything makes much more sense now ;-) > > > >So if you want to submit a patch to remove it, it'll make sense for > >future readers as well ;-) > > Here you go. I'm not subscribe to pgsql-patches, so I posted this here.
I think you should increase pg_control version. -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
