Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >Florian G. Pflug wrote:
> >>Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >>>No you're right, it's related to the WAL undo stuff that was never 
> >>>actually implemented. It's dead code.
> >>>
> >>>Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >>>>Opps, sorry, I missed checkpoint keyword
> >>>>
> >>>>Teodor Sigaev wrote:
> >>>>>>What am I missing?
> >>>>>Seems, it's about that
> >>>>>http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2005-06/msg00085.php
> >>Thanks - everything makes much more sense now ;-)
> >
> >So if you want to submit a patch to remove it, it'll make sense for
> >future readers as well ;-)
> Here you go. I'm not subscribe to pgsql-patches, so I posted this here.

I think you should increase pg_control version.

Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to