On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 12:05 +0900, ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:

> I think it's better to get DSM and HOT together. DSM is good at
> complex updated cases but not at heavily updated cases. HOT has
> opposite aspects, as far as I can see. I think they can cover each
> other.

Very much agreed.

I'll be attempting to watch for any conflicting low-level assumptions as
we progress towards deadline.

  Simon Riggs             
  EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to