I just wanted to voice my opinion for this feature...  I've implemented a
few Production applicaitons with PostgreSQL now and would die for that
feature.  Right now, I am constantly trying to find way's to make my data
more available.  I've even resulted to using pg_dump to create read only
copies of the database and placed them behind load balancers to make the
data more available.  Something like this would allow me to quickly leverage
a read only node to scale out the applicaiton...  If it can at all be built,
it would get my first, second and third vote. :)


Paul Silveira

Jonah H. Harris-2 wrote:
> On 2/26/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Jonah, I have no idea what "fault" you are trying to blame on the
>> community in the above statement.  The author didn't discuss the idea
>> with the community before spending months on it so we have no obligation
>> to accept it in the core.
> You're missing the point entirely.  The majority of the (vocal)
> community didn't even want the feature and as such, failed to provide
> viable suggestions for him to move forward.  As the majority of the
> community didn't want the feature, it wouldn't have made a difference
> when he proposed it; which would have remained negative nonetheless.
> -- 
> Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
> EnterpriseDB Corporation            | fax: 732.331.1301
> 33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor            | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Iselin, New Jersey 08830            | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>                 http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

View this message in context: 
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings

Reply via email to