On 2007-03-02, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew - Supernews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> On 2007-03-02, Gregory Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I think these are actual bugs. If you happened to provide a large enough
>>> datum
>>> to the gist code it would cause the same problem I'm seeing. The packed
>>> varlena patch just makes it easier to trigger.
>> Are you taking into account the fact that, at least prior to your patch,
>> values in index tuples could never be toasted?
> False --- see index_form_tuple().

My mistake.

A closer reading, however, shows that at least for cases like intarray,
btree_gist, etc., the detoasting of an index value is being done in the
gist decompress function, so the value seen via GISTENTRY in the other
functions should already have been detoasted once.

Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to