David Fetter wrote:
Per your earlier suggestion in IRC, I'm picturing a polymorphic
function like

pg_catalog.array_for(typepoid OID)
pg_catalog.array_for(typename NAME)
pg_catalog.array_for(typenamespace NAME, typename NAME)

I don't see a good reason to allow putting array types in a different
schema from their base types.

Actually, I think I prefer Martijns simple SQL extension suggestion better.



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at


Reply via email to