David Fetter wrote:
Per your earlier suggestion in IRC, I'm picturing a polymorphic
function like
pg_catalog.array_for(typepoid OID)
pg_catalog.array_for(typename NAME)
pg_catalog.array_for(typenamespace NAME, typename NAME)
I don't see a good reason to allow putting array types in a different
schema from their base types.
Actually, I think I prefer Martijns simple SQL extension suggestion better.
cheers
andrew
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
