"Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 16:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wonder whether this has any implications for HOT ...
> My general feeling, expressed in a number of recent posts was that the
> VACUUM FULL code really isn't worth the trouble it causes. Especially
> when CLUSTER does a better job anyway?
Point A: we have to fix the back branches anyway.
Point B: until we have an MVCC-safe CLUSTER, that is not a substitute.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
