Galy Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am worrying about the worker-to-do-list in your proposal. I think
> worker isn't suitable to maintain any vacuum task list; instead
> it is better to maintain a unified vacuum task queue on autovacuum share
> memory.

Shared memory is fixed-size.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to