Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> +1 (again) Although I would see something like this:
>> CREATE INDEX fti1 on t1(c1) USING FULLTEXT [WITH] GIST | GIN
>
> Surely the CREATE INDEX syntax has got enough warts on it already.
> Can't we express this as a particular operator class, or something
> that doesn't add any new syntax?
Do you mean something like:
CREATE INDEX fti1 ON t1 USING GIST|GIN(c1) WITH (FULLTEXT)
The above I got from the idea of FILLFACTOR so you could have something
like WITH (FILLFACTOR = 70, FULLTEXT) (not even sure if that is relevant)
OR
CREATE INDEX ftil ON t1 USING GIST|GIN(C1 FULLTEXT);
Where FULLTEXT is like VARCHAR OPS?
I could live with that.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
