"Gregory Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> "Tom Lane" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>  row-ordering discrepancy in rowtypes test                            | 
>> 2007-02-10 03:00:02 |     3
> Is this because the test is fixed or unfixable? If not shouldn't the test get
> an ORDER BY clause so that it will reliably pass on future versions? 

Hm, I took a quick look at this test and while there are a couple tests
missing ORDER BY clauses I can't see how they could possibly generate results
that are out of order. Perhaps the ones that do have ORDER BY clauses only
recently acquired them?

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not

Reply via email to