On 3/21/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am worried that will require CREATE INDEX to wait for a long time.
Not unless there are long running transactions. We are not waiting
for the lock, but only for the current transactions to finish.
Is the pg_index xid idea too complex? It seems to give you the
per-tuple index bit, without the restrictions.
How do we handle HEAP_ONLY tuple cleanup ? If I understood
the proposal correctly, at the end of the create index, a HEAP_ONLY
tuple may have pointer from the new index, isn't it ?