Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So, can't this be improved to allow more aggressive vacuuming?

Not at that level.  We do not keep track of the oldest still-used
snapshot in a transaction.  I'm dubious that it'd be worth the
bookkeeping trouble to try --- often as not, the problem with a
"long running transaction" is that it's a long running statement,

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to