Kenneth Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We use DSPAM as one of our anti-spam options. Its UPDATE pattern is to > increment a spam counter or a not-spam counter while keeping the user and > token information the same. This would benefit from this optimization.
Would it? How wide is the "user and token" information?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
