Kenneth Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We use DSPAM as one of our anti-spam options. Its UPDATE pattern is to
> increment a spam counter or a not-spam counter while keeping the user and
> token information the same. This would benefit from this optimization.

Would it?  How wide is the "user and token" information?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to