"Pavan Deolasee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> What I am proposing is to keep index unusable for existing transactions.
> The index is available for all new transactions even if there are unfinished
> existing transactions. 

Ah thanks, that makes a lot more sense. Sorry for the false alarm.

  Gregory Stark
  EnterpriseDB          http://www.enterprisedb.com

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?


Reply via email to