On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 16:35 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Simon Riggs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Any page written during a backup has a backup block that would not be > > removable by Koichi's tool, so yes, you'd still be safe. > > How does it know not to do that?
Not sure what you mean, but I'll take a stab... I originally questioned Koichi-san's request for a full_page_compress parameter, which is how it would tell whether/not. After explanation, I accepted the need for a parameter, but I think we're looking for a new name for it. -- Simon Riggs EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
