On 3/31/07, Simon Riggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 13:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hm. So anytime we reject a potentially useful index as being not valid
> yet, we mark the plan as "only good for this top-level transaction"?
> That seems possibly workable --- in particular it doesn't get more
> complicated as soon as you consider multiple such indexes.
I like that because its specific in dealing with the exact issue we have
- it doesn't rely on many other things happening correctly.
Ok. Cool. I would finish this work then.
...and it also seems to provide a new route to avoiding the CIC wait.
Yeah, though I would like to take that up later.