Where are we on Python 2.5? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tom Lane wrote: > Neil Conway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> No, it just looks like a Python API 2.5 change to me > > > Attached is a patch that fixes the warnings. Unfortunately, it seems > > this patch won't compile against Python 2.4: the 2.5 API requires the > > use of some typedef's that AFAICS were only introduced in 2.5. > > > Since we presumably still want to support Python < 2.5, we can either > > not apply this patch and tolerate the warnings, or else we can > > workaround the incompatibility with some preprecessor hackery (e.g. > > supply the missing typedef's ourselves if Python doesn't provide them). > > Sounds like #ifdef time to me --- but it seems a bit strange; wouldn't > the Python guys have taken a bit more care for compatibility of > user-supplied code? We're hardly the only people who want to support > multiple Python versions. Perhaps they provide a compatibility hack > that you didn't spot? > > regards, tom lane > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
