Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We'll also need to store the database id along with the event name and 
> message, since pg_listener is per db rather than per cluster.

Well, that's an artifact of the historical implementation ... does
anyone want to argue that LISTEN should be cluster-wide given the

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Reply via email to