Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > We'll also need to store the database id along with the event name and > message, since pg_listener is per db rather than per cluster.
Well, that's an artifact of the historical implementation ... does
anyone want to argue that LISTEN should be cluster-wide given the
opportunity?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
