On 4/5/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote:
> If I am wrong and it's better to leave libxml2-free capabilities, then
> we need to reflect it explicitly in the docs, what requires libxml2, and
> what doesn't

Agreed, let's do the later and update the documentation.

So, you are agreed that I am wrong :-) Well... I would be happy hear some
arguments, but I cannot insist on it :-)

Also, do we
output a helpful message if someone tries to use a libxml2 function that
isn't available.

Yep, here it is:

INSERT INTO xmltest VALUES (1, '<value>one</value>');
ERROR: no XML support in this installation

I suppose we should change it to "no libxml2 support in this installation",
shouldn't we?

Best regards,

Reply via email to