On 4/5/07, Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nikolay Samokhvalov wrote: [...] > If I am wrong and it's better to leave libxml2-free capabilities, then IMHO > we need to reflect it explicitly in the docs, what requires libxml2, and > what doesn't Agreed, let's do the later and update the documentation.
So, you are agreed that I am wrong :-) Well... I would be happy hear some arguments, but I cannot insist on it :-) Also, do we
output a helpful message if someone tries to use a libxml2 function that isn't available.
Yep, here it is: INSERT INTO xmltest VALUES (1, '<value>one</value>'); ERROR: no XML support in this installation I suppose we should change it to "no libxml2 support in this installation", shouldn't we? -- Best regards, Nikolay