On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 04:07:16PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > Some type systems have named array types, some don't. I can live happily > with either. Are array types anonymous in the standard?
Yes, they're anonymous in the standard. That doesn't mean we can't give them names if we wanted... > At any rate, the point of the remark was to take this off the table for now. Sure, once the array types are created automatically the command becomes completely redundant. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <firstname.lastname@example.org> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to > litigate.
Description: Digital signature