> Tatsuo Ishii <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sigh. From the first day when JOHAB was supported (back to 7.3 days),
> > it should had not been in the server encodings. JOHAB's second byte
> > definitely contain 0x41 and above. *johab*.map just reflect the
> > fact. I think we should remove JOHAB from the server encodings list.
> > I'm afraid users who have JOHAB encoded databases get angry, though.
> I think the best way to proceed is probably to fix this in HEAD but
> not back-patch it.  During a dump and reload the encoding can be
> corrected to something safe.

Ok. Shall I go ahead and remove JOHAB in HEAD?
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to