Robert Treat wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 21:25, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > I think that is too strong an assumption, which is why I'm planning to > > back-patch the change to reset statement_timeout to 0 on autovacuum till > > 8.0, as discussed. I think I should also backpatch the change to set > > zero_damaged_pages as well (which is not on 8.0 AFAIR). > > <blinks> Um, can I get a pointer to that thread? I can't imagine why we > would actually want to automatically destroy our data without oversight from > a DBA... I must be reading that wrong.
You are -- I intend to set it to _off_ :-) -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
