Stephan Szabo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2007, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I claim that both ri_KeysEqual() and ri_OneKeyEqual() could consider
>> two nulls to be equal.

> Do you have any suggestions for alternate names? Keeping them using Equal
> seems to be dangerous since people would likely expect it to act like
> normal equality (with nulls being different).

I think Richard's suggestion of KeysUnchanged would work fine.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to