Gregory Stark wrote:
> 
> "Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> > The threads to updatable views have concluded rejecting the patches, and
> > with ideas that require rather extensive rewriting of the rule manager,
> 
> I have some ideas on a different approach to this if anyone's thinking of
> starting fresh 

What ideas?

> but I had the impression that the patches were rejected because
> they were unnecessarily complex, not because the overall approach was
> rejected.

Well, there was the unneeded complexity as one argument, but the "with
check option" stuff needed a big rework as well.

http://groups.google.es/group/pgsql.hackers/browse_thread/thread/ed69543ea417a2f/d0b628881ead1e05

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

Reply via email to