Gregory Stark wrote: > > "Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The threads to updatable views have concluded rejecting the patches, and > > with ideas that require rather extensive rewriting of the rule manager, > > I have some ideas on a different approach to this if anyone's thinking of > starting fresh
What ideas? > but I had the impression that the patches were rejected because > they were unnecessarily complex, not because the overall approach was > rejected. Well, there was the unneeded complexity as one argument, but the "with check option" stuff needed a big rework as well. http://groups.google.es/group/pgsql.hackers/browse_thread/thread/ed69543ea417a2f/d0b628881ead1e05 -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
