Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Alvaro Herrera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The threads to updatable views have concluded rejecting the patches, and
> > with ideas that require rather extensive rewriting of the rule manager,
> I have some ideas on a different approach to this if anyone's thinking of
> starting fresh 

What ideas?

> but I had the impression that the patches were rejected because
> they were unnecessarily complex, not because the overall approach was
> rejected.

Well, there was the unneeded complexity as one argument, but the "with
check option" stuff needed a big rework as well.

Alvaro Herrera                      
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?


Reply via email to